| |
CURRICULUM
Mary Emma Harris
INTERNAL LINK
Small House Exhibition
From 1940-43, when Lawrence Kocher was at Black Mountain, the college
achieved its ideal architecture curriculum: basic courses
in design and color taught by Josef Albers, site planning, discussion of
the college's needs, design of buildings, fund raising, courses in
architecture, and construction. Kocher was assisted at times by four young
architects who were to have influential careers: Willo von Moltke (fall 1940), a German immigrant and graduate
of architecture from the Technische Hochschule in Berlin; Howard Dearstyne
(1941-42), an American who had received his Diploma from the Bauhaus in
1932 and subsequently studied privately with Ludwig Mies van der Rohe; Anatole Kopp (1942-43), a young French immigrant who was completing his
Master of Architecture degree from the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology; and Lou Bernard Voigt, a landscape architect and graduate of
the Harvard School of Design.
It was only when Kocher was at Black Mountain
that there was a prearchitectural classroom curriculum. He offered basic courses in Contemporary Architecture,
Contemporary Architecture Drawing, Mechanical Drawing, Elements of
Architecture (Design), Intermediate Design, Advanced Design, Structural
Design, Postwar Planning, and the History of Architecture. After Kocher
left the college there were sporatic courses in architecture by faculty
and even students including H. McGuire Wood, a designer-builder, who
taught some basic courses in small house design and construction, and Paul
Williams, who had taken some courses in architecture at MIT. Walter Gropius and others lectured
at the summer sessions, and visiting architects were called on for
lectures and discussions.
Essentially the Black Mountain curriculum was
the ideal program Gropius would have liked to have had at Harvard, where
he had to combat a deeply entrenched beaux arts program. It combined basic
courses in the fundamentals of design taught by Josef Albers, classroom
courses, and construction experience. It taught not just information but a
way of thinking and working. Gropius invited Albers to teach at Harvard as
a guest lecturer but he was never able to secure for him a tenured
position. Albers, on the other hand, appreciated the freedom he had at
Black Mountain, and it is questionable whether, had such a position been
offered, he would have accepted.
Albers's basic courses in design and color
opened the students eyes to the nature of form and to the relativity of
perception. In the design class there was an emphasis on the relative
appearance of materials as well as their constructive qualities, essential
training for the architect. Along with these courses there were workshops
in weaving and textile design, woodworking and printing in which students
worked on practical assignments in direct contact with materials.
Although the architectural courses were elementary, the
involvement of students in the total architectural process was
exceptional. Although the decision in the spring of 1940 to expand the
work program to include construction was born of necessity, students, especially those who were later to choose
architecture as a career, recalled the value of constructing buildings
from beginning to completion. Two students -- Robert Bliss and Claude Stoller -- were appointed job captains for small houses. Such an intensive
and encompassing practicum was in essence vastly different from the usual
practical experience in which an architecture student participates in a
construction project for a limited time, primarily following he directions
of a contractor or architect. Paul Beidler, who designed and constructed a
small music practice cubicle with students and faculty, pointed out that
the experience was reminiscent of the master-apprentice relationship
when design its realization in form were not divorced and when architects
learned through building.
Kocher's designs were both experimental and
conventional. In designing the Studies Building, he employed new materials
and inventive construction methods. In designing the barn at the farm,
however, he drew on his knowledge of traditional design an construction.
He felt deeply the responsibility of the
architect to design small, affordable houses for Americans, many of whom
were living in substandard housing. Before coming to Black Mountain he had
designed both a canvas house and a house built of plywood, a relatively
inexpensive new building material at the time. The shacks in which many in
western North Carolina lived the time were a catalyst for an emphasis on
design of modern small houses. (Small
House Exhibition) In 1942 he wrote:
|
“... It is a curious
inconsistency in modern life that the architect contributes so
little to the devising of statutes or other instruments of action
which would further the elimination of squalid-slums in cities and
withing the shadow of factories. Also, can we justify the almost
total neglect of housing for agricultural workers?
In the rural North Carolina . . . [a] declaration of noble purposes
of architecture becomes hollow and inadequate. Throughout the South
(where approximately half of the farms of the United States are
located) the only architecture that closely touches the lives of
white and Negro farmers is housing. A survey of North Carolina
indicates that the Negroes’ houses are from one to three rooms,
mostly crowded, while the white farmers’ houses average four rooms.
In the mountain districts, the houses have one or two rooms, with
only one-fifth having more than four rooms. Most appalling of all,
the families sleep four or more persons to a bedroom.... (The New
Republic, 24 August 1942,p. 237-238). |
After the war the college was
disappointed in its efforts to resume its
building program and design and construction were sporatic and without a
cohesive plan. Although the college's slow decision making process was a
contributing factor, the major problem was its inability in the postwar
construction frenzy to attract a
full-time architect to teach and direct construction. Hopes were raised when Paul Beidler taught briefly in the
spring of 1945 and worked with students on the design and construction of
a music cubicle, but to the disappointment of the community, he left to
resume prewar contracts. When the college hired The Architects
Collaborative to design a women's dormitory, they anticipated that one
member would be in residence to direct construction, but the newly founded
group felt that their own sense of cohesion would be compromised by the
absence of one member.
In 1947, a group of students frustrated by the
failure of the college to go ahead with an architecture program, formed an
architecture study group, and drawing on the knowledge of members who had
taken some basic courses in architecture, they designed and constructed
the Minimum House. This initiative, which would never have been allowed in
most colleges, received faculty approval. In 1949 Robert Turner designed and constructed a Pot Shop.
Paul Williams, who had been instrumental in the design of the Minimum
House, designed
a Science Building to replace the one that burned in 1948. When he left,
however, and appointed students to build the structure, he found that such
labor without supervision was not successful. He returned in 1953 to
oversee completion of the building.
Even those plans which were never constructed
were part of the educational process. When Gropius and Breuer were
commissioned in 1939 to design a buildings for Lake Eden, the entire
community took part in the discussions of the college's needs and the
relationship between their educational ideals and the forms that would
house the community. After the war The Architects Collaborative was
commissioned to design a women's dormitory. When the plans were presented
to the community, a group of students presented an alternative plan for
several small units combining sleeping and study space. Their plan, in
turn, was challenged, and the discussion was the catalyst for an
exhibition of the history of architecture at the college and a discussion
of the relationship between college ideals and architectural form.
Finally, the community reached a compromise: several small dorms with only
sleeping space and a common room in each unit for socializing. By the time
the compromise had been reached and new plans drawn, FHA buildings had
alleviated the housing shortage, and the dorms were never constructed. When
the architect Bertrand Goldberg offered to design and provide the
materials for a small art building as a memorial to his first wife, one
reason that the plans were never realized was the college's hesitation to
have construction directed by Goldberg from a distance.
Peter Oberlander in an article comparing the
curriculum at Harvard and Black Mountain noted that both stood in
opposition to the prevailing eclecticism and that both, rather than
teaching merely problems and solutions, sought to instill in the students
an approach and a "way of thinking." (Architectural Design, April
1948) Claude Stoller, a student who became an architect and teacher,
recalled that when he enrolled at Harvard, many of the students had more
advanced skills in drafting and other technical aspects of architecture.
Although initially he had to struggle to match those skills, the
experience of directing the construction of a small house at Black
Mountain was irreplaceable and invaluable to his more advanced studies.
In the 1943 announcement of the Work Camp for "Students in Architecture
and Those Interested in Building"
"THE STUDENT receiving training in Architecture requires practical field
experience in construction to supplement his drafting board and class room
instruction. The idea of field work in the building crafts is a corollary
to the thoughtful concept of formulating the architect as 'builder'. It
can, probably, be considered as indispensable to the full development of
the student. In this time of war, such experience affords opportunity for
the development of resourcefulness, practical judgment and the ability to
cope with certain kinds of emergency. Students learn that materials have
limitations and laws of their own and that working with them requires
discipline and technique. Some students at the work camp attain a fair
degree of skill in various types of work involved; and for most students
the firsthand acquaintance with modern architectural thought and materials
is a valuable experience." |
|